Test the Test
This abbreviated version consists of 12 questions, excerpted from the administrative, technical and physical segments of the full self-assessment. Once you've completed these 12 questions, fill-in the form below and submit your assessment. Members of the Kroll Fraud Solutions team will analyze your responses and provide recommendations based on the findings.
1. Have Information Classification Guidelines been documented? Information Classification Guidelines identify the different types of information that flow through an organization and the sensitivity of that information. Based on the organization's needs, the greater the sensitivity, the greater the security requirements. Security levels are placed on the different classifications of information and should represent the appropriate security and control measures needed.
Information Classification Guidelines have been documented and are in practice.
Information Classification Guidelines have been documented however the information within is outdated or inconsistently practiced.
Information Classification Guidelines exist but are not consistently practiced.
Information Classification Guidelines do not exist.
2. Are there Information Labeling and Handling Procedures? Procedures for information labeling and handling are important for ensuring the security of sensitive information. For example, information that is labeled as sensitive or confidential may require encryption.
Procedures for information labeling and handling are documented and kept current.
Procedures for information labeling and handling are documented but are not kept current.
Procedures for information labeling and handling are either not fully documented or are assumed.
Procedures for information labeling and handling do not exist.
3. Is there a Clear Desk and Clear Screen Policy? A Clear Desk and Clear Screen Policy ensures that an employee's computer and hard-copy sensitive information is not compromised by an unauthorized user. Screens should be locked when the user leaves their station, and all sensitive or confidential documentation should be stored in a secure place.
A Clear Desk and Clear Screen Policy is well-documented, and is reviewed and updated on a regular basis.
A Clear Desk and Clear Screen Policy has been fully documented, but has not been reviewed or updated on a regular basis.
A Clear Desk and Clear Screen Policy exists, however it is either outdated or the information contained within is sub par.
A Clear Desk and Clear Screen Policy does not exist.
4. Are Third Party Contracts used and current? Third-Party contracts are thorough documents that are written to ensure that there is no misunderstanding between an organization and third-party. Description of services, access control, information security, liabilities and legal responsibilities are just a few of the items that should be covered in a third-party contract.
All Third-Party contracts are used consistently, are current and contain all of the necessary elements.
Third-Party contracts are used on a consistent basis, are current and contain some of the elements.
Third-Party contracts are used, but are either missing several elements, not used consistently or many are not current.
Third-Party contracts are not used or contracts are not kept current.
TECH
5. Are USB data ports disabled for those employees that do not need them? Employees with access to USB ports may use flash drives or other removable media to collect sensitive data. Flash drives come in several shapes and sizes, some are as small as a stick of gum. All are a huge risk as they may contain sensitive information and be carried out of the facility in an employee's purse or pocket.
All USB ports have been disabled for those employees that do not need them.
Some USB ports have been disabled for those employees that do not need them, however there are still some ports enabled.
There has been detailed discussion regarding future plans to disable USB ports for those employees that do not need them.
All USB ports are enabled.
6. Is a Vulnerability Management program in place? Vulnerability Management is critical to the assessment and management of risk. A vulnerability Management Program enables focus, on a consistent basis, on the vulnerabilities facing the organization. Vulnerability scanning is critical, as it alerts the organization of potential holes or weaknesses in the network.
A thorough Vulnerability Management program is in place, with vulnerability scans being conducted on a regular basis.
Vulnerability scans are conducted on a regular basis, however a thorough vulnerability management program does not exist.
An official Vulnerability Management Program does not exist. Vulnerability scans are conducted sporadically, on an 'as needed' basis.
A vulnerability management program is not documented or practiced.
7. Are all system clocks synchronized? All system clocks should be synchronized to ensure accuracy of logs. In the event of a breach, if system clocks are not synchronized, the investigative process could be slowed.
All system clocks have been synchronized.
Several system clocks have been synchronized, not all.
Few system clocks have been synchronized.
System clocks are not synchronized.
8. Are there restrictions on connection times for high-risk applications? Connection times to high-risk applications should be restricted, and follow a updated policy to safeguard against unauthorized access.
Restrictions on connection times to safeguard high-risk applications are in place, practiced on a scheduled basis, and follow an updated Access Control Policy.
Restrictions on connection times to safeguard high-risk applications are in place, and practiced on a scheduled basis, but the policy is outdated.
Restrictions on connection times to safeguard high-risk applications are in place, but not practiced on a regular basis, and there is no documented policy.
There are not restrictions on connection times in place to protect high-risk applications.
9. Are Non-repudiation services being used? i.e. Digital signatures, timestamps To provide security, protection, and to resolve possible disputes of an event or action, the use of Non-repudiation services should be used. Non-repudiation may serve as proof that the information within a file or application was or was not created, altered or transmitted at a particular time or by a particular individual. i.e. Digital Signatures and Timestamps.
Many non-repudiation services are being used on a consistent basis.
Some non-repudiation services are being used on a consistent basis.
Non-repudiation services are used sporadically.
Non-repudiation services are not being used.
PHYSICAL
10. Is cabling protected from interception or damage? Protecting the cables from interception helps ensure that eavesdroppers are not able to easily access sensitive information being transmitted.
All cabling is protected from interception and damage.
Most cabling is protected from interception and damage.
Some cabling is protected from interception and damage.
No cabling is protected from interception and damage.
11. Is there separation of development, test and operational
facilities? Separating development, test and operational facilities is important to achieve segregation of the roles involved. Development and testing activities may cause unintended changes to software and information if they share the same computing environment. Separating development, test and operational facilities is therefore desirable to reduce the risk of accidental change or unauthorized access to operational software and business data.
Development, test and operational areas/facilities are completely separated, with all roles being segregated.
Development, test and operational areas/facilities are partially separated, access is tightly controlled and roles for each area are segregated.
Development, test and operational all reside in the same area/facility, however most roles have been segregated.
Development, test and operational facilities all share the same computing environment. There is no segregation of roles.
12. Do Removal of Property Procedures exist? Removal of Property Procedures are written and practiced to ensure that equipment or media potentially containing sensitive information is not taken from the premises by unauthorized persons.
Removal of Property Procedures have been documented, and are consistently practiced, reviewed and updated on a regular basis.
Removal of Property Procedures have been documented and practiced, but are not reviewed and updated on a regular basis.
Some Removal of Property Procedures are occasionally practiced, however they are not documented or consistent.
Removal of Property Procedures do not exist.